|
Strategic Rail
Finance and Innovative Financing
As a senior policy consultant to Strategic Rail Finance, I provide legislative guidance on transportation policy
recommendations and private-public financing strategies. I
first met Strategic Rail Finance’s president, Michael Sussman, in 1996 during the
drafting process of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA-21). This bill guided federal investments in
highway, mass transit and other federal transportation programs over
a six year period. I
had the good fortune, in 1991, to work as a senior aide and
committee liaison on the
previous six-year Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act.
Beginning in 1995, with the support of the U.S. Department of
Transportation and private sector financing experts, I began work on
a series of bills as an aide to Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro. This
“innovative financing” legislation
was designed to create mechanisms for attracting private investments in
infrastructure with limited public financing support. By
lowering the financial risk of investing in “nationally significant”
projects, private investors and their creditors would be more
inclined to pursue the development of large-scale projects, such as highways, bridges, mass transit, schools, water and
wastewater treatment facilities, ports and airports.
In
spite of significant input from the finance industry and the USDOT,
we had overlooked freight railroads until
Michael Sussman brought the oversight
to our attention. Freight railroad projects, he offered, provide a “public good” service,
and have a low default rate. As he advocated to our members
offices, freight
rail transport is safe, efficient, contributes positively to the
economy, and eases road congestion. Through his
efforts, the legislation was expanded to include
freight rail-related projects.
In
1997, with bipartisan support and the inclusion of innovative
financing provisions by Senator Chafee and Congresswoman
DeLauro, TEA-21 became public law. Intermodal freight railroad
projects with linkages to the National Highway System gained
eligibility for federal innovative finance programs.
Strategic Rail Finance
aided my understanding of the freight rail industry and prompted
congressional efforts to advance tools for expanded funding of
freight railroads. Michael was particularly concerned about
the opportunity of supporting Class II
and III railroads. He offered innovative approaches to the
challenge of financing this under-capitalized industry segment.
Years
later, with Strategic Rail Finance’s ongoing success in
freight rail financing, Michael
Sussman and I continue to collaborate on methods for improving
industry capitalization. Michael’s vision is to see a significant
national increase in freight railroad utilization. With his
continued presentation of new ideas to freight railroad owners, industry
associations, and public sector decision-makers, this vision can become
a reality. |